I am not going to work anymore overtime!?
AP
Housing aid bill faces veto by President Bush
Friday May 9, 4:01 am ET
House passes massive homeowner rescue plan, defying President Bush’s veto threat
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats’ plans to help hundreds of thousands of homeowners struggling with rising subprime mortgage rates and plummeting house values could be sidetracked by President Bush’s threatened veto and the backing of many congressional Republicans.
ADVERTISEMENT
Opponents of the plan say more prudent homebuyers and renters shouldn’t be called upon to bail out borrowers who gambled on ever-rising housing prices and lost.
“The American people don’t want to make their neighbor’s payment when they’re having trouble making their own,” said Rep. Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas.
The Democratic-controlled House on Thursday passed a homeowner rescue plan that would provide cheaper, government-backed mortgages to half a million debt-ridden borrowers and bolster an economy crippled by the housing crisis. The House approved the measure by a vote of 266-154, with 39 Republicans — mostly from areas suffering worst from housing woes — supporting it.
Defying veto threats, the House voted to let the Federal Housing Administration take on up to $ 300 billion in new mortgages so that financially strapped borrowers facing foreclosure could refinance.
The plan by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., is the centerpiece of a broader package of bills approved Thursday that Democrats say will prevent more foreclosures and help homeowners and communities deal with the fallout from the mortgage crisis.
The measure is targeted at homeowners facing default, including many who owe more than their houses are worth.
For instance, a homeowner who owes $ 290,000 on a house now worth $ 225,000 could refinance into an FHA-backed loan if the mortgage holder was willing to take a loss of about 36 percent. The borrower’s monthly mortgage payments would fall from $ 2,200 to about $ 1,200.
Loan holders would have an incentive to participate, proponents believe, since the alternative would be costly foreclosures, which can involve losses of 50 percent or more.
Supporters hope the package — which awaits action in the Senate — will serve as the basis for a broad bipartisan housing compromise that could satisfy both parties’ keen appetite for delivering election-year aid to anxious constituents.
But Bush’s veto warnings, backed by staunch GOP opposition, are clouding its prospects.
“House Democrats passed bills that they know will never become law. Most Americans understand that we shouldn’t create a taxpayer-funded bailout for lenders and speculators,” said Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman.
Under Frank’s plan, homeowners currently considered too risky to qualify could refinance into FHA-backed loans if their lenders agreed to take substantial losses on the original mortgages. Borrowers would have to show they could afford to make payments on the new loans. They would have to share with FHA at least half of their proceeds if they profited from selling or refinancing again.
The plan is projected to cost $ 2.7 billion over the next five years.
The House on Thursday also passed, 239-188, a bill to send $ 15 billion to states to buy and fix up foreclosed property. Bush has threatened to veto that measure also, contending it rewards the very lenders who helped caused the housing chaos and could act as an incentive for them to foreclose rather than find ways to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes.
The bills are H.R. 5818 and H.R. H830
I wonder if the House really saw the obvious side effect of this. If they take a loss on a bunch of loans, they are going to raise their interest rates on ALL of their loans to make up the loss, thereby shifting the expense to people that pay their bills on time and live within their means.
The subprime borrowers are all crying foul, but in my experience they all do that from day one. I have been a loan officer for ten years. Every time I get a customer with bad credit, they have the worst attitude and won’t respond when I tell them what they need to do to fix their credit. They seem to think the world owes them something, but they won’t work for it like the rest of us. I guess I’m the bad guy in their eyes because I won’t put somebody in a loan that can’t afford it and doesn’t look like they will make the payments. Silly me!
At least I can sleep at night.
Was this answer helpful?
LikeDislikeI for one hope he veto’s it. I think its rediculous all these people got these loans knowing what their payments would be and when they cant afford them someone steps in to help them. I think thats just rediculous.
Was this answer helpful?
LikeDislike